All manuscripts submitted to JERLI: Journal of Educational Research and Learning Innovation undergo a rigorous peer-review process to ensure the quality, originality, and academic contribution of the published articles.

Upon submission, each manuscript is first evaluated by the editorial team to determine its suitability with the journal's focus and scope, compliance with submission requirements, and adherence to publication ethics. Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are then sent to at least two independent reviewers who are experts in the relevant field.

The review process is conducted using a double-blind peer-review system, in which the identities of both authors and reviewers are concealed to ensure an objective and unbiased evaluation. Reviewers assess the manuscript based on its originality, significance, methodological rigor, clarity of presentation, validity of results, and contribution to educational research and learning innovation.

Based on the reviewers’ recommendations, the editor may decide to accept the manuscript, request minor revisions, request major revisions, or reject the manuscript. Authors are required to address all reviewer comments and submit a revised version of the manuscript within the specified timeframe.

The final publication decision is made by the Editor-in-Chief based on the reviewers’ reports, the quality of the revised manuscript, and the journal’s editorial standards.